Comments on: iPhone ranks poorly in cellphone radiation comparison http://iphonetouch.blorge.com/2009/09/27/iphone-ranks-poorly-in-cellphone-radiation-comparison/ Top iPhone and Touch news and tips Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:28:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: David Ehm http://iphonetouch.blorge.com/2009/09/27/iphone-ranks-poorly-in-cellphone-radiation-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-17429 David Ehm Tue, 29 Sep 2009 01:52:44 +0000 http://iphonetouch.blorge.com/?p=3502#comment-17429 The iPhone is known to be one of the worst and one reason is that it has so many functions that those that have entered the trance mode can't put it down. Also, the American Cancer Society and the WHO are too severely compromised by money from the telecom industry to have any credibility at all. At a recent conference of scientists in Washington D.C. the representative from the American Cancer Society was nearly tarred and feathered and called "amoral" for the stand that the ACS takes. Many people erroneously look to them for information but should look towards the hundreds of sites that post the latest scientific results like: http://www.wirelesswatchblog.com The iPhone is known to be one of the worst and one reason is that it has so many functions that those that have entered the trance mode can’t put it down. Also, the American Cancer Society and the WHO are too severely compromised by money from the telecom industry to have any credibility at all. At a recent conference of scientists in Washington D.C. the representative from the American Cancer Society was nearly tarred and feathered and called “amoral” for the stand that the ACS takes. Many people erroneously look to them for information but should look towards the hundreds of sites that post the latest scientific results like: http://www.wirelesswatchblog.com

]]> By: RSDouglass http://iphonetouch.blorge.com/2009/09/27/iphone-ranks-poorly-in-cellphone-radiation-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-17379 RSDouglass Mon, 28 Sep 2009 05:19:47 +0000 http://iphonetouch.blorge.com/?p=3502#comment-17379 My Take? My 'take' is that your article is pure sensationalism; especially the title, which, if one actually reviews the data, is totally inaccurate! My Take?

My ‘take’ is that your article is pure sensationalism; especially the title, which, if one actually reviews the data, is totally inaccurate!

]]> By: Joe Anonymous http://iphonetouch.blorge.com/2009/09/27/iphone-ranks-poorly-in-cellphone-radiation-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-17375 Joe Anonymous Mon, 28 Sep 2009 02:14:33 +0000 http://iphonetouch.blorge.com/?p=3502#comment-17375 When are you going to stop using stupid, misleading headlines? Headline: iPhone ranks poorly Text: iPhone is right in the middle of the pack and its emissions are within 5% of the average for all phones. How about real content and then headlines that match? Is that too much to ask? When are you going to stop using stupid, misleading headlines?

Headline: iPhone ranks poorly

Text: iPhone is right in the middle of the pack and its emissions are within 5% of the average for all phones.

How about real content and then headlines that match? Is that too much to ask?

]]> By: John http://iphonetouch.blorge.com/2009/09/27/iphone-ranks-poorly-in-cellphone-radiation-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-17374 John Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:36:19 +0000 http://iphonetouch.blorge.com/?p=3502#comment-17374 The evidence and simple physics argues against health problems due to cell phones - here's a 2009 National Cancer Institute fact sheet: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/risk/cellphones The data supports, at most, tiny health effects, and are most consistent with no effect. The evidence and simple physics argues against health problems due to cell phones – here’s a 2009 National Cancer Institute fact sheet:

http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/risk/cellphones

The data supports, at most, tiny health effects, and are most consistent with no effect.

]]>