<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T sues Verizon over &#8216;there&#8217;s a map for that&#8217; ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iphonetouch.blorge.com/2009/11/03/att-sues-verizon-over-theres-a-map-for-that-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iphonetouch.blorge.com/2009/11/03/att-sues-verizon-over-theres-a-map-for-that-ads/</link>
	<description>Top iPhone and Touch news and tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:28:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald O Carlson</title>
		<link>http://iphonetouch.blorge.com/2009/11/03/att-sues-verizon-over-theres-a-map-for-that-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-19968</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald O Carlson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iphonetouch.blorge.com/?p=3861#comment-19968</guid>
		<description>Edge has been consistently referred to as 2.5G. I&#039;ve never heard it called 3G and the difference speed/latency doesn&#039;t warrant any change.

Great point about wi-fi — they should be pushing that advantage as AT&amp;T hotspots are everywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edge has been consistently referred to as 2.5G. I&#8217;ve never heard it called 3G and the difference speed/latency doesn&#8217;t warrant any change.</p>
<p>Great point about wi-fi — they should be pushing that advantage as AT&amp;T hotspots are everywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat S</title>
		<link>http://iphonetouch.blorge.com/2009/11/03/att-sues-verizon-over-theres-a-map-for-that-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-19962</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iphonetouch.blorge.com/?p=3861#comment-19962</guid>
		<description>I think the ATT lawsuit has merit.  The International Mobile Telecommunications-2000 (IMT-2000),standard included Edge in the standard. EDGE can be considered a 3G radio technology and is part of ITU&#039;s 3G definition.  Verizon has conveniently left this factoid off.  If they are talking broadband coverage then they need to include WIFI since ATT has a wifi network and Verizon does not.  That said I think it&#039;s a great ad and definitely highlights the differences between the two carriers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the ATT lawsuit has merit.  The International Mobile Telecommunications-2000 (IMT-2000),standard included Edge in the standard. EDGE can be considered a 3G radio technology and is part of ITU&#8217;s 3G definition.  Verizon has conveniently left this factoid off.  If they are talking broadband coverage then they need to include WIFI since ATT has a wifi network and Verizon does not.  That said I think it&#8217;s a great ad and definitely highlights the differences between the two carriers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

